The
Green Mule: A Tale of 2 Bands Live in NYC
Gov't Mule Roseland Ballroom 9/13/2004
Green Day Irving Plaza 9/21/2004
by Mike D'Ariano
know what you're thinking. What the hell could Green Day and Gov't
Mule possibly have in common? Am I right? I bet I am. And if that's
so, you're probably also thinking that we just got lazy like some
other music publications (Hey, it takes a lot of time to decide
that Like A Rolling Stone is just a hair better than Satisfaction)
and crammed two reviews into one for no good reason. Well you're
wrong.
Aside
from the fact that the two bands sit next to each other in my iPod,
and the interesting reality that both groups are hugely successful
in genres that most people thought had faded away a quarter of a
century ago, there's an even more logical reason to review these
shows together. Within an eight-day span this past September, I
watched both the hippy jamband that's too heavy and thirty years
too late to be a hippy jamband, and the punk rock band that's twenty
years too late and too poppy to be a punk rock band. They performed
their entire new albums live from start to finish. Oh, and both
groups think Bush is a dick.
There's
no way to write a review of these shows with out reviewing the two
new records. To keep it simple, I'll just say this. Both albums
- Gov't Mule's "Deja Voodoo" and Green Day's "American
Idiot" -will make my personal list of the best ten albums of
2004. Green Day's will make the top three. Aside from the obvious
differences that coming from two totally different genres result
in, these albums are fundamentally different.
Green Day's album is the most ambitious of their career. The so-called
"Punk Rock Opera" tells a continuous story throughout
the album (how successful or unsuccessful this aspect of the record
is, is another issue) and shows the band pushing themselves to create
the most challenging music they've ever attempted. The guys that
got famous writing three-minute power pop odes to girls, losing
your mind, and doing lots of speed, are now writing songs that push
the ten-minute mark. They contain several distinct movements (that's
fancy speak for parts of the same song that sound totally different
- "A Day In The Life" for example) and deal with complex
issues like, well okay it's still mostly about girls, losing your
mind and doing drugs, oh and Bush being a dick. Did I mention the
songs are like ten minutes long?
Gov't Mule, on the other hand, is no stranger to the ten minute
song. In fact, it's kinda their thing. While there may only be one
or two extra long tunes on the new record, trust me, they tend to
grow on stage. That growth, which is happening nightly right about
now, is the fundamental difference that I mentioned earlier. Green
Day, has reached an apex point, with their latest album. It's without
a doubt grander than anything they've done before, and the reason
for that is that they've grown as a band for the last fifteen years.
Gov't Mule however, is starting anew with their latest.
The
short version of Mule's pre Deja Voodoo history is that the band,
initially a trio, recorded three albums together before their bass
player Allen Woody passed away in the summer of 2000. Next the surviving
members recorded two albums featuring a different bassist on every
track. The guest players included Les Claypool (Primus), Oteil Burbridge
(The Allman Brothers Band) John Entwhistle (The Who) and some 20
plus others, many of whom sat in with the band on the subsequent
tours. Late in 2003, Mule announced that Andy Hess, a former bassist
for the Black Crowes, would be the band's newest member, and in
addition announced that they were no longer a trio by making keyboard
player Danny Louis a permanent member of the group. Deja Voodoo
is first release by the new line-up. It shows.
Don't
get me wrong, after all I did say it was one of the year's ten best,
the Mule album is really good. It just feels like it's the beginning
of something. The tunes don't mesh with each other as nicely as
they could, and while the band is tight as hell, things don't quite
flow as smoothly as I for one expect they will in years to come.
In weeks to come for that matter, I've heard tapes of a few shows
from this tour, and what I'm talking about is already going down
on stage a little more each night.
|

|
|
Taken
with an LG camera phone.
"Life's Good" but their camera phones aren't!
|
With
the albums out of the way, on to the concerts. We've already established
that I personally enjoy the Green Day album more. What does that
mean in terms of performance? Apparently nothing. Gov't Mule's live
performance of Deja Voodoo blew away both the studio version of
the album, and Green Day's effort at performing their latest. Even
with seven guys on stage, (yeah they're still a trio but when you
need a tympani in a song you need a tympani player) Green Day couldn't
even begin to touch the roar of sound that is live Gov't Mule.
I think the easiest way to explain the difference
between the two acts is to look at their drummers. Green Day's Tre
Cool donned headphones for part of their set so he presumably could
play along to a click track and in turn keep time properly. Meanwhile,
Gov't Mule's Matt Abts played a custom built drum kit which featured
two bass drums stuck together with a mic in the middle so he could
get a bigger sound. After a ridiculous drum solo, and an equal measure
of applause, Mule's singer/guitarist Warren Haynes joked with the
crowd, "Don't encourage him. Next tour he'll have three bass
drums." What I'm pointing out here is that basically, one guy
needed electronic assistance to play right, and the other created
a whole new technique so he could get exactly the sound he wanted.
Now
the flipside. Green Day's gig got infinitely better when they finished
with the new stuff, as well as the bloated line-up, and tore into
some of their classics. After four tunes from their earlier records,
the guys played a rockin' cover of Queen's "We Are The Champions"
and left the crowd begging for more. Conversely, the Mule gig lost
a bit of steam during the second set which consisted of older material,
a few covers, and despite the promise of "lots of surprises"
featured no special guests or departures from your basic Mule set
All
in all, both shows like the albums they showcased were great. Initially
I was tempted to give Green Day the advantage because due to punk
rock etiquette (the ability to violently shove someone near you
out of the way when you need a little space) the show was somewhat
more comfortable. But then I remembered that no one fell on my head
during either of Mule's two sets so I'll call it a draw.
Photos
by Mike D'Ariano
|